Scopic

Incorrect password

Skip to content

Scopic vs Scrintal

You can draw connections. You cannot read them.

Scrintal gives you a visual canvas for your cards and lines. Scopic turns those lines into records: named, typed, openable, queryable.

Join waitlist

Scopic map view

Scopic · Map

Screenshot: Scopic map view

Connections named and typed. Open any one as its own record with properties and notes.

Scrintal canvas view

Scrintal

Screenshot: Scrintal

Visual cards connected by lines. The lines themselves carry no data and cannot be opened.

In Scrintal, a connection shows that two cards are related. In Scopic, a connection says how they are related, what that relationship carries, and what else belongs to it.

What it gets right

Scrintal understands that knowledge lives in the space between notes, not just inside them. The canvas-first approach puts spatial thinking at the centre rather than treating it as a secondary view over a list of documents. Cards are full documents — they can hold rich text, images, and embedded content.

The interface is clean and well-considered. Creating a card, moving it, linking it to another card — these actions all feel natural. For writers and researchers who think better when they can see everything laid out spatially, Scrintal gets a lot right.

Where it stops

The connections in Scrintal are lines. They show that two cards are linked but carry nothing about why, how, or under what conditions. You cannot name a connection, give it a type, set a date on it, or open it. Two cards can be connected in a hundred different ways — funding, opposition, collaboration, causation — and Scrintal represents all of them identically.

There is no database view. The spatial canvas is the only way to see and interact with your content. You cannot filter your cards by property, sort them by date, or query a subset. The visual is the whole product.

Name what the connection means

In Scopic, every connection is a record. Name it 'Funds', 'Challenges', 'Reports to'. Add a date, a source, a confidence level. Open any connection and it shows its own properties alongside the two things it links. In Scrintal, a line between two cards is a visual mark. It stores nothing.

Theory of Change · Map

Screenshot: named connection open, showing type and properties

Filter by what connections mean

In Scopic, every connection type is queryable. Show only connections named 'blocks', or 'funds', or 'supports'. Filter the map to a single relationship type and see the network it creates. The database holds every connection as a row you can sort, group, and open. In Scrintal, there is no filter.

Stakeholder map · Filtered

Screenshot: map filtered to one connection type

Database view alongside the map

Scopic gives every element a row in the database. Sort by any property, filter by connection type, open any element as a page with its full connection list. The map and the database are two views of the same underlying data — not separate representations. Scrintal has no database view.

Research project · Database

Screenshot: database view showing elements as sortable rows

What people say

JT

Jess Thornton

@jessthornton

Scrintal was the closest thing I'd found to how I think. Scopic is closer. The difference is whether the connections themselves mean anything. In Scrintal they don't.

2 weeks ago

RM

Raj Mehta

@rajmehta

I kept drawing the same kinds of connections in Scrintal and wanting to label them. Moved to Scopic and the first thing I did was name every connection type in my project. Changed how I saw the whole structure.

1 month ago

SV

Soline Varet

@solinevaret

Scrintal: beautiful canvas, no structure. Scopic: beautiful canvas, real structure underneath. I wanted both.

3 weeks ago

MB

Marcus Bell

@marcusbell

The thing I couldn't do in Scrintal was ask 'show me only the funding relationships'. In Scopic that's one filter. That's the whole difference.

2 months ago

PN

Priya Nair

@priyanair

Built a concept map in Scrintal and realised I had no way to see all the 'causes' relationships at once. Moved to Scopic. Now I can.

6 weeks ago

TA

Tom Achebe

@tomachebe

Scrintal is where I draft. Scopic is where I think. That difference became clear after about a week of using both.

3 months ago

At a glance

Scopic Scrintal
Connections you can name and describe
Add custom properties to a connection
Filter the map by connection type
Database view of all elements
Open a connection as its own page
Map as a primary working space
Cards as rich-text documents
Page view for each element
Local-first storage Cloud only

See what named connections change.

Join waitlist